Crypto: Aave Governance Dispute Escalates As Aci And Aave Labs Publish...

Crypto: Aave Governance Dispute Escalates As Aci And Aave Labs Publish...

Competing reports outline contrasting views on protocol revenue, development and funding accountability.

A governance dispute inside the Aave ecosystem intensified after two detailed reports offered contrasting interpretations of the protocol’s past funding and contributions ahead of a vote on a proposed $50 million package for Aave Labs.

Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) founder Marc Zeller on Wednesday published what he called a transparency report reviewing Aave Labs’ historical funding and applied a return-on-investment framework to past DAO grants. Hours earlier, Aave Labs released its own contributions report outlining its role in building the protocol since 2017.

The dispute centers on the “Aave Will Win” framework, a proposal asking tokenholders to approve funding worth up to $42.5 million in stablecoins and 75,000 AAVE (AAVE) tokens. In return, Aave Labs would route 100% of revenue from Aave-branded products to the Aave DAO treasury under a DAO-funded operating model, according to the proposal and related forum posts.

The debate has broadened beyond the size of the funding request to include questions about accountability standards, revenue attribution and who maintains the protocol’s core infrastructure.

It follows the recent announcement that BGD Labs, a core technical contributor, will conclude its involvement with the DAO on April 1.

Zeller’s report said Aave Labs has received about $86 million in lifetime capitalization, including its 2017 initial coin offering (ICO) proceeds, venture funding and DAO payments.

He argued that future DAO grants should be evaluated using measurable revenue impact and clearer disclosure standards.

ACI, a service provider to the Aave DAO and not a neutral party in the debate, questioned whether governance votes should be unbundled to separate funding, revenue alignment and V4 ratification.

Zeller wrote that funding decisions should be tied to performance benchmarks and transparent reporting.

Source: CoinTelegraph