Tools: AV1 vs VP9 vs VP8: Codec Comparison Guide 2025

What is a Video Codec? ## Why Video Compression Matters? ## Google’s Open-Source Codec Family ## VP8 codec ## How It Works ## What is VP9? ## How It Works ## 10 Points of Comparison for VP8 vs VP9 vs AV1 ## 1. Release year ## 2. Compression Efficiency ## 3. Encoding Performance ## 4. Color Depth and HDR Support ## 5. CPU Consumption ## 6. Browser and Device Support ## 7. Bandwidth Savings ## 8. Licensing and Accessibility ## 9. Live Streaming Ready ## 10. Supported Streaming Protocols ## What Codec To Choose Between VP8, VP9, and AV1? ## How to Migrate from VP8, VP9, or AV1 ## How to Migrate from VP8 to VP9 Codec ## How to Migrate from VP9 to AV1 ## Phase 1: Assessment ## Phase 2: Hybrid Deployment ## Phase 3: Full AV1 Adoption ## Future Of Video Compression With VP8, VP9, And AV1 ## Current Market Position (2025) ## Short-term Strategy (2026 -2027) ## Long-term Vision (2025 – 2030 years) ## Conclusion We covered how VP9 compares to H.264 and H.265 in our previous blog. In this one, we’ll look at which codec comes out on top in the fight between VP8 vs VP9 vs AV1. You’ll learn how they differ in compression efficiency, encoding performance, HDR support, CPU consumption, browser support, licensing, bandwidth savings, supported streaming protocols, and development readiness. We’ll also cover what the next five years may hold for these codecs. If you’d rather skip ahead to the “How to Choose a Codec” or “How to Migrate” section, check the table of contents below. A video codec is a software or hardware process that compresses or decompresses digital video. Video codecs are employed to reduce the size of video media to take-up less storage when archived and lower bitrates to stream; both yielding cost savings. When you watch a video online, the codec compresses it for sending and then decompresses it for viewing. Codecs are used in streaming, video calls, and everyday video playback. Video compression is the process of reducing the size of raw or encoded video data by removing redundant or unnecessary information, while preserving as much of the original visual fidelity as possible. It enables large video files to be transmitted, stored, and played efficiently over networks by encoding frames more compactly. In modern streaming technology, video compression is crucial because it strikes the balance between video quality and bandwidth use. Without compression, high-resolution streams would demand enormous amounts of bandwidth, likely causing buffering and high costs for both providers and users. For example, switching from H.264 to HEVC can cut required bandwidth nearly in half for the same perceived quality. Efficient compression lets platforms deliver smooth, high-quality video even over constrained networks, reduce delivery and storage costs, and scale to global audiences. Google’s open-source codec family (VP8, VP9, and AV1) represents a complete evolution of video compression technology over the past decade. Understanding the progression and differences between these codecs is crucial for streaming platforms, content creators, and developers making infrastructure decisions. This codec family emerged from Google’s acquisition of On2 Technologies in 2010 and the subsequent Alliance for Open Media’s mission to create royalty-free, open-source video standards. From VP8’s foundational work to AV1’s cutting-edge compression, each codec has played a vital role in democratizing high-quality video streaming. That’s why we will review these codecs in historical order. VP8 codec is a royalty-free video compression standard that enables efficient delivery of high-quality video while minimizing bandwidth requirements. It is widely used in modern streaming and real-time video applications because it provides a good balance between compression efficiency and playback performance. VP8 compresses video by removing redundant information within and between frames to reduce file sizes while maintaining visual quality. It was engineered to simplify decoding compared to earlier formats, making it more practical for web and real-time uses. Learn more about this codec in Google’s official VP8 Data Format and Decoding Guide. Some of the key advancements include: VP9 codec is a royalty-free, open-source video coding standard developed by Google. It emerged as a free competitor to closed-source codecs like H.265. It was designed to meet the demands of modern video content and significantly improve coding efficiency over its predecessor, VP8. Like H.265, VP9 uses larger block structures (up to 64×64 pixels) compared to H.264’s 16×16 macroblocks, enabling more efficient compression. It employs advanced intra-frame prediction, motion compensation, and entropy coding to reduce redundancy. These techniques allow VP9 to achieve better quality than H.264 at the same bitrate while remaining royalty-free for developers. VP9 introduced several significant technical improvements over its predecessor VP8, aimed at increasing compression efficiency, enhancing video quality, and optimizing performance for a wide range of devices and network conditions. Each codec supports different streaming protocols, which affects how easily they can be integrated into live video workflows. For the most advanced streaming, use Red5 Pro. Its adaptive streaming capabilities automatically pick the best codec for each viewer based on device support and network conditions, so you can deliver the optimal experience without manual switching. Steps to Transition from VP8, VP9, or AV1 codecs. Organizations still using VP8 should prioritize VP9 migration: Get in touch with us if you are interested. Current VP9 implementations can gradually adopt AV1: AV1 codec support in Red5 Pro is coming early 2026. Get in touch with us today to join the waitlist and be among the first to try it. The evolution from VP8 through VP9 to AV1 represents more than a decade of advancement in open-source video compression technology. Each codec has served its purpose: VP8 established the foundation for royalty-free web video, VP9 delivered the quality and efficiency needed for mainstream adoption, and AV1 pushes the boundaries of what’s possible in video compression. For organizations making codec decisions today, VP9 offers the best balance of quality, performance, and compatibility for most live streaming applications. AV1 provides a strategic path forward for premium applications and future-proofing, while VP8 remains relevant for legacy compatibility requirements. Red5 Pro’s comprehensive support for all three codecs enables organizations to implement optimal strategies based on their specific requirements, audience capabilities, and quality objectives. Whether maintaining VP8 for legacy support, leveraging VP9 for mainstream applications, or pioneering with AV1 for next-generation streaming, Red5 Pro provides the infrastructure foundation for success. The codec landscape continues evolving rapidly, but the VP codec family’s commitment to open standards and royalty-free licensing ensures these technologies will remain accessible and viable for organizations of all sizes in an increasingly video-centric digital world. To learn how the AV1 codec compares to H.264 and or to H.265, read our next blogs. Templates let you quickly answer FAQs or store snippets for re-use. Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink. Hide child comments as well For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse - Royalty-Free Licensing: VP8 was one of the first modern codecs offered without licensing fees, making it accessible for developers and platforms without legal or financial barriers. - Efficient Compression: VP8 delivers a solid balance of video quality and file size, reducing bandwidth consumption while maintaining acceptable visual fidelity for HD streaming. - Web Integration: Designed with web video in mind, VP8 became the core codec for the WebM container format, ensuring broad support across browsers and online platforms. - Real-Time Suitability: With relatively low computational complexity, VP8 is well-suited for real-time applications like video conferencing, where both quality and low latency are critical. - Error Resilience: VP8 introduced techniques to handle transmission errors more gracefully, improving reliability in streaming environments with unstable network conditions. - VP8: The Foundation (2010) VP8 was Google’s first major foray into open-source video compression after acquiring On2 Technologies. Released in 2010 and subsequently open-sourced, VP8 was designed to compete directly with H.264 while remaining completely royalty-free. It became the foundation for WebM container format and was widely adopted for web-based video applications. - VP9: The Breakthrough (2013) VP9, released by Google in 2013, represented a significant leap forward in compression efficiency. It was designed as an open-source alternative to the proprietary H.265/HEVC codec and offered substantial improvements over both VP8 and H.264. VP9 became widely adopted across YouTube, Netflix, and other major streaming platforms. - AV1: The Future (2018) AV1, finalized in 2018, builds upon VP9’s foundation while incorporating advanced compression techniques developed by the Alliance for Open Media. This consortium includes industry giants like Google, Mozilla, Netflix, Amazon, and Apple, ensuring broad industry support for the standard. - VP8 Characteristics:– Provided compression efficiency comparable to H.264 baseline. – Used 4×4 and 16×16 block-based transform coding. – Employed simple loop filtering and basic entropy coding. – Optimized primarily for web-based 720p/1080p content. - VP9 Improvements:– Delivered approximately 50% better compression than VP8. – Introduced variable block sizes from 4×4 to 64×64 pixels. – Advanced loop filtering and improved motion prediction. – Better handling of high-resolution content up to 4K. - AV1 Advances: – Achieves 30-50% better compression efficiency than VP9. – Advanced block partitioning with up to 128×128 superblocks. – Sophisticated intra-prediction with 56 directional modes. – Enhanced entropy coding with symbol-adaptive arithmetic coding. – Optimized for high-resolution streaming, supporting 4K and 8K video. - VP8 Performance: – Fast encoding suitable for real-time applications. – Low computational requirements. – Mature, optimized encoder implementations. - VP9 Performance: – Moderate encoding complexity, 2-3x slower than VP8. – Well-optimized implementations available (libvpx). – Good balance of quality and encoding speed. - AV1 Performance: – Significantly higher computational complexity (5-10x slower than VP9). – Rapidly improving software optimizations. – Quality gains and overall bandwidth savings often justify computational cost for many applications. - VP8: No native HDR support. VP8 is limited to 8-bit color depth and lacks HDR metadata handling. - VP9: Supports HDR with 10-bit and 12-bit color depth and can carry HDR10 and HLG metadata. VP9 Profile 2 specifically enables HDR playback. - AV1: Full HDR support with 10-bit and 12-bit color depth, wide color gamut (BT.2020), HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision. AV1 was designed with HDR as a baseline requirement. - VP8: Lightweight on CPU during encoding and decoding, thanks to its simpler tools and 8-bit, baseline design. (No strong source explicitly quantifying, but its use in real-time apps like early WebRTC is consistent with low CPU overhead.) - VP9: While most mobile devices support VP9, most other systems do not. Without direct hardware support, the VP9 encoding process will peg the CPU, consuming a large amount of resources, decreasing battery life, and potentially increasing latency. - AV1: AV1 encoding and software decoding are significantly more CPU intensive than VP9, making it more suitable for offline or server-side encoding rather than real-time on devices lacking hardware support. - VP8: Supported in Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari (for WebRTC). Android supports VP8 playback in WebM since version 2.3. On iOS, VP8 is available only through WebRTC, not for native video playback. Limited support also exists in some legacy smart TVs. - VP9: Supported in Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari (starting with version 14 on macOS Big Sur / iOS 14). Android supports VP9 playback natively (since Android 4.4 KitKat). Hardware decoding is widely available, and many smart TVs support VP9 for 4K streaming (especially YouTube and Netflix apps). - AV1: Supported in Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and recent Safari builds (macOS 16 / iOS 16+) when hardware decoding is present. AV1 playback is supported on Android 10+ devices with hardware decoders, and smart TV manufacturers such as Samsung, LG, and Sony include AV1 support in models released from 2020 onward. - VP8: Provides moderate bandwidth savings compared to older codecs like H.264, but is less efficient than newer options. It reduces file sizes while maintaining acceptable quality, making it practical for basic HD streaming where bandwidth demands are moderate. - VP9: Offers significantly better bandwidth efficiency than VP8, reducing data use by around 30–50% at the same visual quality. This makes VP9 well suited for high-definition and 4K streaming, allowing smoother playback and reduced buffering on lower-bandwidth connections. - AV1: Delivers the strongest bandwidth savings of the three codecs, with compression efficiency improvements of 30–50% over VP9. This efficiency makes AV1 ideal for 4K, 8K, and HDR content, as it provides higher video quality at lower bitrates, helping streaming services scale while reducing delivery costs. - VP8: A royalty-free codec provided as open source, making it accessible for developers without licensing costs. - VP9: Google offers VP9 as an open-source codec, available royalty-free to encourage widespread adoption and integration, presenting a more accessible option for developers and content providers looking to implement high-efficiency video coding without the burden of licensing fees. Having a free high-performance codec for use in Google Chrome was likely one of the main reasons for Google to offer it as open source. - AV1: Backed by the Alliance for Open Media, AV1 is open source and royalty-free. It was designed to be an industry-standard codec that removes licensing barriers for modern video applications, giving developers and providers an advanced option for delivering high-quality, bandwidth-efficient video without additional costs. - VP8: Fully supported for live streaming and real-time communication. It remains ready for use but is increasingly considered a legacy option as newer codecs provide greater efficiency and features. - VP9: Ready and actively used for live streaming today. It offers better efficiency than VP8 while maintaining real-time performance, making it a common choice for platforms that prioritize quality and bandwidth savings. - AV1: Still developing in the live streaming space. - VP8 Codec: Supports WebRTC for real-time communication and is compatible with most HTML5 video playback workflows. It has limited adoption in modern adaptive streaming protocols and is rarely used with legacy options like RTMP or RTSP. - VP9 Codec: VP9 supports WebRTC, MPEG-DASH, and YouTube streaming. It provides limited RTMP/RTSP usage. - AV1 Codec: Supported in modern streaming workflows such as MPEG-DASH and HLS with CMAF packaging. AV1 integration into WebRTC is still developing, and support for RTSP is not available. Recently RTMP gained support for AV1 via Enhanced RTMP. - If you need broad compatibility with older devices and browsers, low computational costs, and a reliable fallback option for legacy hardware, choose VP8. It is cost-effective for basic applications but offers only moderate bandwidth efficiency. - If you need a mainstream codec that balances performance and efficiency, integrates well with WebRTC, and benefits from widespread hardware acceleration, choose VP9. Significant bandwidth savings justify its higher encoding overhead, making it a proven ROI choice for medium- to large-scale deployments. - If you need a future-ready solution for premium applications where maximum bandwidth efficiency and next-generation quality are critical, choose AV1. Although it carries a higher initial encoding cost, savings of 30–50% in bandwidth and growing hardware acceleration make it a strong long-term option for high-volume streaming. - Immediate 40-50% bandwidth savings - Maintained compatibility across devices - Improved quality at equivalent bitrates - Hardware acceleration benefits - Evaluate current VP9 performance metrics. - Test AV1 encoding with representative content. - Assess target audience device capabilities. - Calculate potential bandwidth cost savings. - Implement AV1 for supported devices with VP9 fallback. - Monitor quality and performance across both codecs. - Optimize encoding parameters independently. - Gradually increase AV1 usage as support expands. - Transition primary encoding to AV1 where supported. - Maintain VP9 for legacy device compatibility. - Implement intelligent codec selection algorithms. - Monitor long-term performance and cost benefits. - VP8 Codec: Legacy support and basic applications. - VP9 Codec: Mainstream choice for most streaming applications. - AV1 Codec: Premium applications and future-focused implementations. - AV2 Codec: Next-generation codec AV2 is planned for release by the end of 2025 as the successor to AV1, designed to deliver even greater compression efficiency and to serve as a cornerstone of AOMedia’s future technology stack. - VP9 remains optimal for latency-critical live streaming. - AV1 adoption accelerates for high-quality, bandwidth-sensitive applications. Hardware acceleration makes AV1 increasingly viable. - Hybrid approaches maximize compatibility and efficiency. - AV2 gains broader adoption as hardware vendors, browsers, and streaming platforms begin integrating decoding and encoding support. - AV1 becomes the dominant open-source codec. - VP9 maintains relevance for specific compatibility requirements. - VP8 relegated to legacy system support. - AV2 becomes mainstream for high-end and large-scale deployments, especially as hardware acceleration matures across devices.