Blazor Saas Starter Kits Compared: When To Choose Brick Starter For...

Posted on Dec 14

• Originally published at brickstarter.net on Dec 14

Blazor SaaS starter kits give .NET teams a faster path to multi‑tenant, subscription‑based applications, but they differ a lot in focus, features, and how much they handle beyond UI. Brick Starter sits in the category of full‑stack C# SaaS foundations, combining a Blazor UI option with a feature‑rich ASP.NET Core backend built specifically for SaaS and multi‑tenancy.

Blazor lets developers build rich web UIs in C# instead of JavaScript, which is attractive to .NET teams who want full‑stack C# across client and server. However, building a serious SaaS app still demands multi‑tenant architecture, authentication, billing, localization, admin tools, and deployment plumbing—far beyond what “File → New Blazor App” provides.​

Blazor‑focused SaaS starter kits exist to package those repetitive capabilities into reusable templates, so teams can start from a running Blazor + ASP.NET Core SaaS skeleton instead of reinventing every infrastructure piece.

Most Blazor SaaS kits fall into three broad types.​

Brick Starter fits into the third category, where the goal is to ship production SaaS, not just a nice Blazor front end.​

Several Blazor‑based SaaS kits are frequently mentioned in .NET and SaaS communities.​

These can be excellent for teams comfortable extending infrastructure, but they still expect you to fill gaps, especially around multi‑tenant billing and operations.​

Brick Starter is a .NET SaaS boilerplate that supports multiple front‑end stacks—including Blazor—on top of a single, feature‑rich ASP.NET Core backend. The same backend powers Blazor, Angular, React, Vue, Next.js, and Razor, so C# teams can stay in .NET on both client and server while choosing the best UI for each project.​

Out of the box, Brick provides SaaS‑critical building blocks:​

Source: Dev.to