Tools

Tools: How We Built a Code Quality Pipeline That Roasts Bad PRs Before Humans Have To

2026-03-15 0 views admin
Tools: How We Built a Code Quality Pipeline That Roasts Bad PRs Before Humans Have To

The Slow Descent Into "It's Fine, Ship It"

"But What About CodeRabbit / AI Review Tools?"

"Why Not Biome / oxlint / Modern Linters?"

The Architecture: The Quality Gauntlet

Layer 1: Pre-Commit Hooks (lint-staged)

Layer 2: GitHub Actions — The PR Gatekeepers

The Linter Workflow

The Duplicate i18n Check (Our Favorite)

Gitleaks Secret Scan

The Rulebook: ESLint Rules That Actually Matter

max-lines: 500 — The God Component Killer

complexity: 10 — Keep Functions Readable

react/prop-types: error — Component Contracts

camelcase: error — One Convention to Rule Them All

prettier/prettier: error — Formatting Is Not a Discussion

The Smart Part: Overrides

What We'd Do Differently

The Takeaway Nobody wakes up one day and decides to ruin a codebase. It's more of a group activity that happens gradually, like a potluck where everyone brings potato salad. When our team was small — two or three devs who reviewed every line — code quality maintained itself through osmosis. We all knew the patterns. We all agreed on formatting. Nobody wrote an 800-line component because someone would notice and gently question their life choices. Then the team grew. More features, more devs, more PRs flying in simultaneously. And the cracks started showing: No single dramatic incident. No production outage. Just a slow, steady erosion of the standards we thought were obvious. Death by a thousand "LGTM, merge it" reviews. Code review alone couldn't save us — reviewers are human, PRs are long, and "does this file exceed 500 lines?" isn't the kind of thing you catch at 11 PM after your third coffee. We needed robots. Specifically, mean robots that block your PR and make you feel bad about your formatting choices. Fair question. We use CodeRabbit for PR reviews and it's great at catching logic issues and suggesting improvements. But on the free tiers, it suggests fixes — it doesn't enforce them. A developer can read CodeRabbit’s “you should fix this formatting” comment, nod thoughtfully… and merge anyway. We needed something with teeth. Something that physically prevents a merge until the code meets the bar. So we built our own enforcement layer with GitHub Actions. Also a fair question. New-gen linters like Biome are blazing fast and genuinely exciting. But our build pipelines are still on older Node versions, and our entire toolchain — Babel plugins, Webpack config, ESLint plugins for Redux-Saga, styled-components accessibility — is deeply integrated with the ESLint ecosystem. Migrating to Biome would mean rebuilding a lot of that plugin infrastructure. ESLint isn't the shiny new thing, but it's battle-tested, extensible, and — critically — it works with our current stack without a rewrite. Sometimes the boring tool that ships today beats the exciting tool that requires a migration quarter. We ended up with a layered quality pipeline. Each layer catches different things at different stages, so by the time code reaches master, it's been interrogated more thoroughly than a suspect in a crime drama. Each layer exists because the previous one isn't enough. The ESLint rulebook defines what matters — it's the foundation that powers everything else. lint-staged catches formatting but only runs on staged files. GitHub Actions catches everything but only on PRs. All three together form the net. One layer alone is a suggestion. Three layers together are the law. The PR checks run in parallel — the linter, duplicate i18n check, and Gitleaks scan are independent workflows that kick off simultaneously. Since they don't share state, GitHub runs them on separate runners at the same time. For most repos, the entire suite finishes in under a minute. You push, you wait a few seconds, and you know exactly where you stand. The first line of defense runs before code ever leaves your machine: Every git commit triggers this. JavaScript files get ESLint with --fix — formatting issues, missing semicolons, trailing spaces are auto-corrected before you even see them. JSON files get Prettier. The developer doesn't have to remember anything. The formatting wars are over before they start. Note: If you're on an older version of lint-staged (< v10), you'll need to add "git add --force" after each command. v10+ handles re-staging automatically. But lint-staged only touches staged files. If ComponentA.js is clean but ComponentB.js already has a linting error, lint-staged won't catch it. Also, a developer can bypass this entirely with git commit --no-verify. (We trust our team, but we also trust automation more.) That's where the real enforcers come in. Every PR triggers a full ESLint pass across the entire codebase. Here's the workflow (condensed — the real one installs ~30 packages): A few things worth calling out: The clean-slate install. We nuke node_modules, package-lock.json, .npmrc, and the npm cache before installing. Aggressive? Yes. It ensures we're never tripped up by stale local artifacts. One tradeoff worth noting: deleting the lockfile means CI resolves versions independently from your local setup, so there's a slim chance of version drift between what devs run locally and what CI installs. For linting-only deps this is a low risk we accept — but for production installs, you'd want to keep the lockfile. Every PR, every branch. Not just master — every branch. If your feature branch has a lint error, you know immediately. It blocks the merge. This is a required check. No "I'll fix it in the next PR" escape hatch. The robot says no, the robot means no. This one solves a problem that quietly costs real money at scale, and we haven't seen many teams talk about it. The problem: In a large internationalized codebase, many features define their own messages.js file for react-intl. Over time, different developers writing similar features independently define the same English string: Two different IDs, same defaultMessage. In English, no one notices. But when you send these to a translation vendor, you're paying to translate the same string multiple times. Worse — different translators might translate "Save" differently, so users see inconsistent text across the product. One screen says the equivalent of "Store" and another says "Keep." Subtle, but it erodes trust. At scale — dozens of languages, hundreds of message strings — these duplicates add up fast in translation costs and QA time. The workflow is dead simple: The custom script behind it: When it fails, the output is clear: PR blocked. Fix is always the same: extract the shared string to a common messages file or reuse the existing definition. This single check has saved us from dozens of translation inconsistencies — and a non-trivial amount of translation spend. We also run Gitleaks on every PR to master. It scans for accidentally committed secrets — API keys, tokens, credentials: Standard security hygiene. If you're not doing this, start today. It catches the kind of mistake that turns a normal Tuesday into an incident response. The rules are the backbone. Anyone can set up a linter — the interesting part is what you choose to enforce. Here's our opinionated ruleset with the "why" behind each choice. 500 lines is generous enough for complex forms but strict enough to prevent the 800-line monsters that nobody wants to review and everybody pretends they'll "refactor someday." If your component hits 500 lines, it's doing too much. Split it. Your future self (and your reviewers) will thank you. Cyclomatic complexity of 10 means a function can have at most 10 independent paths. This catches those deeply nested if/else/switch pyramids that look like they were written during a fever dream. If your function has complexity 15, it needs decomposing. Yes, we know TypeScript exists. We're not using it (yet). PropTypes are the closest thing to a component contract in JS-land. When a new dev opens a component, propTypes tells them exactly what it expects — no reading the entire render method to figure out what props exist. Try reading a codebase where half the variables are user_name and the other half are userName. It's like reading a book where the author randomly switches between British and American spelling. Technically functional, spiritually painful. Prettier as an ESLint error means formatting violations block the merge. Not warnings. Not suggestions. The specific settings (single quotes, 100-char lines) matter less than the fact that they're enforced uniformly. Tabs vs spaces debates belong in 2015 where we left them. Not every file should follow the same rules. This is where the config stops being dogmatic and starts being practical: Reducers get unlimited complexity because Redux reducers are fundamentally big switch statements. A reducer handling 15 actions has complexity 15 — that's not bad code, that's just how reducers work. Forcing artificial splits would make the code worse. Sagas get complexity + camelcase exemptions because sagas are the boundary layer where external API naming (user_name, created_at) meets internal conventions. Forcing camelcase there means either renaming every API field or suppressing the rule on every line. Both are worse than the override. Tests get relaxed rules because we want developers to write more tests, not fewer. If prop-types or max-lines are blocking test coverage, the rules are hurting more than helping. Outdated Node in CI. Our linter workflow was pinned to an older Node version for a while — the kind of tech debt that works fine until it doesn't, like driving with an expired inspection sticker. Upgrading means verifying 30+ Babel and ESLint packages resolve correctly on the newer runtime. We got there eventually, but it sat on the "we'll get to it" list longer than we'd like to admit. The clean-slate install is slow. Nuking node_modules and reinstalling from scratch on every PR isn't fast. Dependency caching (actions/cache) would fix this. We traded speed for reproducibility, but you can have both. If you're setting up quality gates for a multi-developer codebase, here's the framework: Start with the rules. Define what "good code" means in your linter config. Be opinionated — it's easier to relax rules than to introduce them into a codebase that's already feral. Enforce locally. lint-staged + pre-commit hooks fix the easy stuff automatically. Zero friction. Enforce in CI. GitHub Actions catch what local hooks miss — and unlike pre-commit hooks, they can't be skipped with --no-verify. Write overrides, not exceptions. Instead of // eslint-disable-next-line scattered across hundreds of files, configure overrides by file pattern. Encode your team's decisions in the config, not in comments. Build custom checks for your pain. The duplicate i18n check isn't in any plugin — we wrote it because it was our problem. Every codebase has unique failure modes. Write scripts to catch yours. The goal isn't zero lint warnings. The goal is that a new developer can join the team, open a PR, and the pipeline tells them exactly how the team writes code — without anyone writing a Confluence doc that nobody reads. Running custom quality checks in your CI that go beyond standard linting? I'd love to hear what problems they solve. Drop them in the comments. Templates let you quickly answer FAQs or store snippets for re-use. Hide child comments as well For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse

Code Block

Copy

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ QUALITY PIPELINE │ │ (a.k.a. "The Gauntlet") │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ The Foundation: THE RULEBOOK │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ .eslintrc.yml — the opinionated ruleset │ │ │ │ max-lines, complexity, prop-types, camelcase │ │ │ │ + smart overrides for reducers/sagas/tests │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ powers both layers below │ │ v │ │ Layer 1: COMMIT TIME (local) │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ lint-staged │ │ │ │ • ESLint --fix on staged *.js files │ │ │ │ • Prettier on staged *.json files │ │ │ │ Catches: formatting, auto-fixable errors │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ v │ │ Layer 2: PR TIME (GitHub Actions — run in parallel) │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ │ │ JS Linter │ │ Duplicate i18n │ │ Gitleaks │ │ │ │ (full ESLint)│ │ (cross-file) │ │ (secrets) │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └───────┬─────────┘ └─────┬─────┘ │ │ └────────────┬────┘ │ │ │ v │ │ │ Merge blocked until ALL pass ◄───┘ │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ QUALITY PIPELINE │ │ (a.k.a. "The Gauntlet") │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ The Foundation: THE RULEBOOK │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ .eslintrc.yml — the opinionated ruleset │ │ │ │ max-lines, complexity, prop-types, camelcase │ │ │ │ + smart overrides for reducers/sagas/tests │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ powers both layers below │ │ v │ │ Layer 1: COMMIT TIME (local) │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ lint-staged │ │ │ │ • ESLint --fix on staged *.js files │ │ │ │ • Prettier on staged *.json files │ │ │ │ Catches: formatting, auto-fixable errors │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ v │ │ Layer 2: PR TIME (GitHub Actions — run in parallel) │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ │ │ JS Linter │ │ Duplicate i18n │ │ Gitleaks │ │ │ │ (full ESLint)│ │ (cross-file) │ │ (secrets) │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └───────┬─────────┘ └─────┬─────┘ │ │ └────────────┬────┘ │ │ │ v │ │ │ Merge blocked until ALL pass ◄───┘ │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ QUALITY PIPELINE │ │ (a.k.a. "The Gauntlet") │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ The Foundation: THE RULEBOOK │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ .eslintrc.yml — the opinionated ruleset │ │ │ │ max-lines, complexity, prop-types, camelcase │ │ │ │ + smart overrides for reducers/sagas/tests │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ powers both layers below │ │ v │ │ Layer 1: COMMIT TIME (local) │ │ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ lint-staged │ │ │ │ • ESLint --fix on staged *.js files │ │ │ │ • Prettier on staged *.json files │ │ │ │ Catches: formatting, auto-fixable errors │ │ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ v │ │ Layer 2: PR TIME (GitHub Actions — run in parallel) │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │ │ │ JS Linter │ │ Duplicate i18n │ │ Gitleaks │ │ │ │ (full ESLint)│ │ (cross-file) │ │ (secrets) │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └───────┬─────────┘ └─────┬─────┘ │ │ └────────────┬────┘ │ │ │ v │ │ │ Merge blocked until ALL pass ◄───┘ │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ { "lint-staged": { "*.js": "npm run lint:eslint:fix", "*.json": "prettier --write" }, "pre-commit": "lint:staged" } { "lint-staged": { "*.js": "npm run lint:eslint:fix", "*.json": "prettier --write" }, "pre-commit": "lint:staged" } { "lint-staged": { "*.js": "npm run lint:eslint:fix", "*.json": "prettier --write" }, "pre-commit": "lint:staged" } name: JavaScript Linting Validator on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: - '*' jobs: js-lint: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 'lts/*' # Nuclear option: clean slate every time - run: rm -f .npmrc - run: rm -rf node_modules package-lock.json - run: npm cache clean --force # Install only linting deps (not the whole project) - name: Install ESLint + Prettier + Babel deps run: | npm install "@babel/core@^7.26.7" \ "@babel/eslint-parser@^7.26.5" \ "eslint@^8.57.0" \ "eslint-config-prettier@^10.0.1" \ "eslint-plugin-react@^7.37.4" \ "eslint-plugin-prettier@^5.2.3" \ "prettier@^3.4.2" \ # ... ~20 more packages --no-save --silent - run: npx eslint . name: JavaScript Linting Validator on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: - '*' jobs: js-lint: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 'lts/*' # Nuclear option: clean slate every time - run: rm -f .npmrc - run: rm -rf node_modules package-lock.json - run: npm cache clean --force # Install only linting deps (not the whole project) - name: Install ESLint + Prettier + Babel deps run: | npm install "@babel/core@^7.26.7" \ "@babel/eslint-parser@^7.26.5" \ "eslint@^8.57.0" \ "eslint-config-prettier@^10.0.1" \ "eslint-plugin-react@^7.37.4" \ "eslint-plugin-prettier@^5.2.3" \ "prettier@^3.4.2" \ # ... ~20 more packages --no-save --silent - run: npx eslint . name: JavaScript Linting Validator on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: - '*' jobs: js-lint: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 'lts/*' # Nuclear option: clean slate every time - run: rm -f .npmrc - run: rm -rf node_modules package-lock.json - run: npm cache clean --force # Install only linting deps (not the whole project) - name: Install ESLint + Prettier + Babel deps run: | npm install "@babel/core@^7.26.7" \ "@babel/eslint-parser@^7.26.5" \ "eslint@^8.57.0" \ "eslint-config-prettier@^10.0.1" \ "eslint-plugin-react@^7.37.4" \ "eslint-plugin-prettier@^5.2.3" \ "prettier@^3.4.2" \ # ... ~20 more packages --no-save --silent - run: npx eslint . // In CreateEntity/messages.js defineMessages({ saveButton: { id: 'app.createEntity.save', defaultMessage: 'Save' }, }); // In EditEntity/messages.js (different dev, different sprint) defineMessages({ saveAction: { id: 'app.editEntity.save', defaultMessage: 'Save' }, }); // In CreateEntity/messages.js defineMessages({ saveButton: { id: 'app.createEntity.save', defaultMessage: 'Save' }, }); // In EditEntity/messages.js (different dev, different sprint) defineMessages({ saveAction: { id: 'app.editEntity.save', defaultMessage: 'Save' }, }); // In CreateEntity/messages.js defineMessages({ saveButton: { id: 'app.createEntity.save', defaultMessage: 'Save' }, }); // In EditEntity/messages.js (different dev, different sprint) defineMessages({ saveAction: { id: 'app.editEntity.save', defaultMessage: 'Save' }, }); name: Check Duplicate i18n Messages on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: ['*'] jobs: check-duplicates: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 'lts/*' - run: node scripts/check-duplicate-messages.js name: Check Duplicate i18n Messages on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: ['*'] jobs: check-duplicates: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 'lts/*' - run: node scripts/check-duplicate-messages.js name: Check Duplicate i18n Messages on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: ['*'] jobs: check-duplicates: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 'lts/*' - run: node scripts/check-duplicate-messages.js Found 47 message files to check CROSS-FILE DUPLICATE MESSAGE VALUE FOUND Value: "Save" In app/components/pages/CreateEntity/messages.js: - ID: app.createEntity.save In app/components/pages/EditEntity/messages.js: - ID: app.editEntity.save Cross-file duplicate message values found. Found 47 message files to check CROSS-FILE DUPLICATE MESSAGE VALUE FOUND Value: "Save" In app/components/pages/CreateEntity/messages.js: - ID: app.createEntity.save In app/components/pages/EditEntity/messages.js: - ID: app.editEntity.save Cross-file duplicate message values found. Found 47 message files to check CROSS-FILE DUPLICATE MESSAGE VALUE FOUND Value: "Save" In app/components/pages/CreateEntity/messages.js: - ID: app.createEntity.save In app/components/pages/EditEntity/messages.js: - ID: app.editEntity.save Cross-file duplicate message values found. name: Gitleaks Secret Scan on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: [master] jobs: gitleaks: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 - uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2 env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} name: Gitleaks Secret Scan on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: [master] jobs: gitleaks: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 - uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2 env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} name: Gitleaks Secret Scan on: pull_request: types: [opened, reopened, synchronize] branches: [master] jobs: gitleaks: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 - uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2 env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} max-lines: - error - max: 500 max-lines: - error - max: 500 max-lines: - error - max: 500 complexity: - error - max: 10 complexity: - error - max: 10 complexity: - error - max: 10 react/prop-types: error react/require-default-props: error react/prop-types: error react/require-default-props: error react/prop-types: error react/require-default-props: error camelcase: - error - properties: always camelcase: - error - properties: always camelcase: - error - properties: always prettier/prettier: - error - { singleQuote: true, printWidth: 100, endOfLine: 'lf' } prettier/prettier: - error - { singleQuote: true, printWidth: 100, endOfLine: 'lf' } prettier/prettier: - error - { singleQuote: true, printWidth: 100, endOfLine: 'lf' } overrides: - files: '**/reducer.js' rules: complexity: off - files: '**/saga.js' rules: complexity: off camelcase: off - files: '**/*.test.js' rules: react/prop-types: off - files: '**/tests/**/*.test.js' rules: complexity: off camelcase: off max-lines: off overrides: - files: '**/reducer.js' rules: complexity: off - files: '**/saga.js' rules: complexity: off camelcase: off - files: '**/*.test.js' rules: react/prop-types: off - files: '**/tests/**/*.test.js' rules: complexity: off camelcase: off max-lines: off overrides: - files: '**/reducer.js' rules: complexity: off - files: '**/saga.js' rules: complexity: off camelcase: off - files: '**/*.test.js' rules: react/prop-types: off - files: '**/tests/**/*.test.js' rules: complexity: off camelcase: off max-lines: off - Components quietly ballooning past 700 lines — because "I'll refactor it later" (narrator: they did not refactor it later) - Formatting roulette: tabs here, spaces there, trailing commas in this file but not that one - Duplicate i18n messages across different feature modules — the same English string defined in three different messages.js files with three different IDs, leading to translation mismatches and wasted localization budget (more on this — it's a bigger deal than it sounds) - console.log('HERE') statements left behind like breadcrumbs from a debugging session that ended three sprints ago - var declarations showing up in a modern codebase, haunting us like a ghost from JavaScript past - Recursively finds every messages.js and message.js file - Regex-extracts all { id: '...', defaultMessage: '...' } definitions — handling single-line, multi-line, and template literal formats - Builds a map of message values to their file locations - Flags any defaultMessage that appears in two or more different files - Start with the rules. Define what "good code" means in your linter config. Be opinionated — it's easier to relax rules than to introduce them into a codebase that's already feral. - Enforce locally. lint-staged + pre-commit hooks fix the easy stuff automatically. Zero friction. - Enforce in CI. GitHub Actions catch what local hooks miss — and unlike pre-commit hooks, they can't be skipped with --no-verify. - Write overrides, not exceptions. Instead of // eslint-disable-next-line scattered across hundreds of files, configure overrides by file pattern. Encode your team's decisions in the config, not in comments. - Build custom checks for your pain. The duplicate i18n check isn't in any plugin — we wrote it because it was our problem. Every codebase has unique failure modes. Write scripts to catch yours.

🏷️ Tags

toolsutilitiessecurity toolsbuiltqualitypipelineroastsbeforehumans

More from Tools

Tools: Gas-Aware Trading: Execute Only When Gas Is Cheap (2026)

Tools: Gas-Aware Trading: Execute Only When Gas Is Cheap (2026)

2026-03-30 0
Tools: Grafana k6 Has a Free API That Load Tests Your APIs With JavaScript - Full Analysis

Tools: Grafana k6 Has a Free API That Load Tests Your APIs With JavaScript - Full Analysis

2026-03-30 0
Tools: Caddy Has a Free API That Gives You Automatic HTTPS With Zero Configuration (2026)

Tools: Caddy Has a Free API That Gives You Automatic HTTPS With Zero Configuration (2026)

2026-03-30 0
Tools: Fly.io Has a Free API That Deploys Docker Apps Globally With Edge Hosting (2026)

Tools: Fly.io Has a Free API That Deploys Docker Apps Globally With Edge Hosting (2026)

2026-03-30 0

Trending

1

CVE-2025-61481: Critical Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in MikroTik RouterOS & SwitchOS

2025-10-27 • 189 views
2

CVE-2025-43939: Dell Unity OS Command Injection (High)

2025-10-30 • 148 views
3

Google disputes false claims of massive Gmail data breach

2025-10-30 • 130 views
4

Microsoft: DNS outage impacts Azure and Microsoft 365 services

2025-10-30 • 88 views
5

3.5B Accounts, 1 Critical Flaw: Meta Closes WhatsApp Data-Harvesting

2025-11-25 • 81 views