Would Love Feedback On My Latest Cloud/finops Explainer 🙌 Solved:

Posted on Jan 6

• Originally published at wp.me

Navigating the complexities of cloud costs and demonstrating their business value is crucial. This post provides practical strategies to enhance your FinOps explainers, drive adoption, and implement effective cost management, ensuring your efforts resonate across all levels of your organization.

You’ve poured effort into your latest Cloud/FinOps explainer. It’s technically sound, comprehensive, and you believe it clearly articulates the principles. Yet, feedback is lukewarm, adoption is slow, or perhaps you’re just not seeing the desired shift in cloud spending culture. Why?

Often, the problem isn’t the data itself, but how it’s presented and contextualized. Here are common symptoms indicating your FinOps communication might need a re-think:

Despite providing detailed reports, teams continue to provision resources without sufficient cost awareness, leading to budget surprises.

Your explainers are primarily consumed by other FinOps practitioners or finance, but not actively engaged with by engineers, product owners, or executive leadership.

The conversation remains focused solely on the cost of cloud, rather than the value derived from it or the optimized cost-per-unit of business output.

Finance blames engineering for overspending; engineering blames finance for not understanding technical needs. There’s a lack of shared responsibility.

Teams don’t know the exact cost of their services, making it hard to make informed optimization decisions or demonstrate ROI for specific projects.

Teams are still manually identifying and optimizing resources, which is time-consuming, prone to error, and doesn’t scale.

Source: Dev.to