Gaming: 'vibe Coding Kills Open Source' Claims New Paper, As Its Authors...

"Vibe coding raises productivity... but it also weakens the user engagement through which many maintainers earn returns."

A newly-published paper entitled "Vibe coding kills open source" makes the claim that everyone's favourite new hobby—that is, using AI tools to code their own products—is actively damaging the developers of open source software.

"Vibe coding raises productivity by lowering the cost of using and building on existing code, but it also weakens the user engagement through which many maintainers earn returns," says the paper, which was authored by several experts from various universities and institutes on the topic.

"When OSS is monetized only through direct user engagement, greater adoption of vibe coding lowers entry and sharing, reduces the availability and quality of OSS, and reduces welfare despite higher productivity," the paper continues.

Speaking to The Register, one of the co-authors of the paper, university professor Miklós Koren, said:

"We know that developers have adopted vibe coding very fast. [Anthropic CEO] Dario Amodei has famously said that '70, 80, 90 percent of the code written in Anthropic is written by Claude.' So users of vibe coding find it easy to switch to this mode of building software. This implies that human attention towards producers of OSS is shrinking."

Koren goes on to claim that the shift in attention towards vibe coding has hidden costs for OSS developers, leading to potentially lower community recognition, reputation, and job prospects.

"High-quality projects can still thrive," said Koren. "We don't think that large OSS projects will disappear overnight. But it will be harder to get beyond the 'cold start problem' and get an otherwise promising project off the ground.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

"Or maintainers of marginally successful projects may lose their motivation and stop contributing. The proverbial 'random person in Nebraska' may give up."

Source: PC Gamer