Quick Verdict

Overview

Feature Comparison

Installation Complexity

Community and Support

Use Cases

Choose Wiki.js If...

Choose DokuWiki If...

Final Verdict

Can I migrate from DokuWiki to Wiki.js?

Is DokuWiki still actively maintained?

Which is better for a small team wiki?

Can DokuWiki use Markdown?

Related Wiki.js is the better choice for most new installations. It has a modern UI, multiple editor options, built-in Git sync, and strong authentication support. DokuWiki wins on simplicity — no database required, flat-file storage, and two decades of battle-tested stability. If you want zero-maintenance documentation storage, DokuWiki. If you want a modern wiki experience, Wiki.js. Updated March 2026: Verified with latest Docker images and configurations. Wiki.js is a modern wiki platform built with Node.js and Vue.js. It uses PostgreSQL for storage, supports multiple editor types (Markdown, WYSIWYG, HTML), and integrates with Git for version-controlled documentation. Current stable version is 2.5. Wiki.js site DokuWiki is a classic wiki engine built with PHP. It stores all content in plain text files — no database required. It uses its own wiki syntax (similar to MediaWiki) and has a massive plugin ecosystem built over 20 years. DokuWiki site DokuWiki is one of the simplest wikis to deploy. No database setup required — it stores everything in text files. The LinuxServer.io Docker image needs only PUID/PGID and a volume mount. After starting, complete setup via the web installer. Wiki.js requires PostgreSQL, which adds another container to manage. The initial setup has more configuration options (authentication providers, editor defaults, search settings). More powerful, but more to configure. DokuWiki is significantly lighter. It can run on a Raspberry Pi with minimal resources. Wiki.js needs more memory for the Node.js runtime and PostgreSQL. Wiki.js has 25,000+ GitHub stars and an active community. Documentation is comprehensive. Development on v2.x has slowed with v3.0 in progress. DokuWiki has a 20-year track record, extensive documentation, a large forum community, and 1,000+ plugins. It's one of the most mature wiki platforms available. Updates are less frequent but the software is extremely stable. Wiki.js for modern teams. The UI is polished, editors are flexible, and Git sync is a killer feature for developer teams. The trade-off is complexity — PostgreSQL management, more memory usage, and a slower v2.x development pace. DokuWiki for simplicity. Twenty years of stability, no database to manage, and backups are literally copying a directory. The UI is dated, but the plugin ecosystem compensates for missing features. If you value reliability over aesthetics, DokuWiki is the safer bet. There's no official migration tool. DokuWiki stores pages as text files with its own syntax, which can be converted to Markdown with community scripts. Expect some manual cleanup, especially for plugins and custom syntax. Yes, though releases are infrequent. DokuWiki follows a slow, stable release cycle. The codebase is mature — there's less to fix or change compared to newer projects. The plugin ecosystem continues to see updates. For a team under 10 people with basic needs, DokuWiki's simplicity wins. No database to manage, minimal resources, and it just works. For teams that want a more polished experience, Wiki.js is worth the extra setup. Via a plugin, yes, but it's not the native syntax. DokuWiki's own syntax is well-documented and simpler than MediaWiki markup, but it's not Markdown. If Markdown is a hard requirement, Wiki.js is the better choice. Templates let you quickly answer FAQs or store snippets for re-use. as well , this person and/or - You want a modern, polished UI

- You need Git-synced documentation- Your team uses Markdown- You need OIDC/SAML single sign-on- You're building a large wiki (1,000+ pages) - You want zero database maintenance- You need maximum simplicity and stability- You want extensive plugin customization- You're comfortable with wiki syntax- Resources are constrained (Raspberry Pi, small VPS)- You need reliable backup (just copy text files) - How to Self-Host DokuWiki with Docker- How to Self-Host Wiki.js- Wiki.js vs BookStack- DokuWiki vs MediaWiki- BookStack vs Outline- Self-Hosted Alternatives to Confluence- Best Self-Hosted Wiki